# Timesync -- All The things you should know `Time Synchronization` is the core part of `Milvus 2.0`, it affects all components of the system. This article describes the desgin detail of `Time Synchronization`. In the `Milvus 2.0`, all events (such as `Create Collection`, `Insert`, `Search`, `Drop Collection`, etc.) have a `Timestamp` to indicate when does this event occurred. Suppose there are two users, `u1` and `u2`, have connected to the `Milvus`, and do the following actions at their respective timestamp. | timestamp | u1 | u2 | |-----------|----------------------|--------------| | t0 | create Collection C0 | - | | t2 | - | search on C0 | | t5 | insert A1 into C0 | - | | t7 | - | search on C0 | | t10 | insert A2 | - | | t12 | - | search on C0 | | t15 | delete A1 from C0 | - | | t17 | - | search on C0 | Ideally, `u2` expects `C0` is empty when it searches at `t2`, and could only sees `A1` at `t7`; at `t12` , the search from `u2` could sees both `A1` and `A2`, but only sees `A2` at `t17`. It's much easier to achieve these targets in `single-node` database. But for `Distributed System` , such like `Milvus`, it's a little difficult, and the following problems needs to be solved. 1. If `u1` and `u2` are on different nodes, and their time is not synchronized. To give an extreme example, suppose that the time of `u2` is 24 hours later than `u1`, then all the operations of `u1` can't been seen by `u2` until next day. 2. Network latency. If `u2` starts the `Search on C0` at `t17`, then how to ensure that all the `events` before `t17` have been processed. If the envents of `delete A1 from C0` has been delayed dure to the network latency, then it would lead to incorrect state: `u2` would see both `A1` and `A2` at `t17`. `Time synchronization system` is used to solve the above problems. ## Timestamp Oracle(TSO) Like [TiKV](https://github.com/tikv/tikv), `Milvus 2.0` provides `TSO` service, all the events must alloc timestamp from `TSO`,not use local timestamp any more, so the first problem should be solved. `TSO` is provided by `RootCoord` component, clients could alloc one or more timestamp at single request, the `proto` is defined as follows. ```proto service RootCoord { ... rpc AllocTimestamp(AllocTimestampRequest) returns (AllocTimestampResponse) {} ... } message AllocTimestampRequest { common.MsgBase base = 1; uint32 count = 3; } message AllocTimestampResponse { common.Status status = 1; uint64 timestamp = 2; uint32 count = 3; } ``` `Timestamp` is type of `uint64`, contains physical and logical parts. This is the format of `Timestamp` ![Timestamp struct](./graphs/time_stamp_struct.png) In the `AllocTimestamp` request, if `AllocTimestampRequest.count` if greater than `1`, then in the response, `AllocTimestampResponse.timestamp` indicates the first available timestamp. ## Time Synchronization In order to understand the `Time Synchronization` better, firstly we need to introduce the data operation of `Milvus 2.0` briefly, taking `Insert Operation` as example. - Users can configure lots of `Proxy` to achieve load balancing, in `Milvus 2.0` - `SDK` could connect to any `Proxy` - When `Proxy` receieves `Insert` Request from `SDK`, it would hash the `InsrtMsg` by `Primary key`, and then split the `InsertMsg` into different `MsgStream` according to the hash value. - Each `InsertMsg` would be assigned an `Timestamp` before send to the `MsgStream.` *Note: `MsgStream` is the wrapper of message queue, the default message queue in `Milvus 2.0` is `pulsar`* ![proxy insert](./graphs/timesync_proxy_insert_msg.png) Based on the above information, we can know that the `MsgStream` have the following characteristics: - In `MsgStream`, `InsertMsg` from the same `Proxy` must be incremented in timestamp - In `MsgStream`, `InsertMsg` from different `Proxy` have no relationship in timestamp The following figure shows an example of `InsertMsg` in `MsgStream`, the snippet contains 5 `InsertMsg`, 3 of them from `Proxy1` and others from `Proxy2`. The 3 `InsertMsg` from `Proxy1` are incremented in timestamp, and the 2 `InsertMsg` from `Proxy2` are also incremented in timestamps, but there is no relationship between `Proxy1` and `Proxy2`. ![msgstream](./graphs/timesync_msgstream.png) So the second problem has turned into this: after reading a message from `MsgStream`, how to make sure that all the messages earlier than this timestamp have been consumed. For example, when I read a message , whoes timestamp is `110` and produced by `Proxy2`, from `MsgStream`, but the message ,whoes timestamp is `80` and produced by `Proxy1`, is still in the `MsgStream`, what shoudl I do on this status? The following graph shows the core logic of `Time Synchronization System` in `Milvus 2.0`, it should solve the second problem. - Each `Proxy` will periodically reports the latest timestamp of every `MsgStream` to `RootCoord`, the default interval is `200ms` - For each `Msgstream`, `Rootcoord` finds the minimum timestamp of all `Proxies` on this `Msgstream`, and inserts this minimum timestamp into the `Msgstream` - When the consumer reads the timestamp inserted by the `RootCoord` on the `MsgStream`, it indicates that the messages eariler than this timestamp have been consumed, so all actions that depend on this timestamp can be executed safely - The message inserted by `RootCoord` into `MsgStream` is type of `TimeTick` ![upload time tick](./graphs/timesync_proxy_upload_time_tick.png) This is the `Proto` that usecd by `Proxy` to report timestamp to `RootCoord`: ```proto service RootCoord { ... rpc UpdateChannelTimeTick(internal.ChannelTimeTickMsg) returns (common.Status) {} ... } message ChannelTimeTickMsg { common.MsgBase base = 1; repeated string channelNames = 2; repeated uint64 timestamps = 3; uint64 default_timestamp = 4; } ``` After inserting `Timetick`, the `Msgstream` should looks like this: ![msgstream time tick](./graphs/timesync_msgtream_timetick.png) `MsgStream` will process the messages in batches according to `TimeTick` , and ensures that the output messages meet the requirements of timestamp. For more details, please refer to the `MsgStream` design detail.