enhance: Solve channel unbalance on datanode (#34984) (#35033)

issue: #33583
pr: #34984
the old policy permit datanode has at most 2 more channels than other
datanode. so if milvus has 2 datanode and 2 channels, both 2 channels
will be assign to 1 datanode, left another datanode empty.

This PR refine the balance policy to solve channel unbalance on datanode

---------

Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@zilliz.com>
This commit is contained in:
wei liu 2024-07-29 11:33:50 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent d16320705e
commit a2c19af3ed
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
2 changed files with 50 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -332,17 +332,32 @@ func AvgBalanceChannelPolicy(cluster Assignments) *ChannelOpSet {
totalChannelNum += len(nodeChs.Channels)
}
channelCountPerNode := totalChannelNum / avaNodeNum
maxChannelCountPerNode := channelCountPerNode
remainder := totalChannelNum % avaNodeNum
if remainder > 0 {
maxChannelCountPerNode += 1
}
for _, nChannels := range cluster {
chCount := len(nChannels.Channels)
if chCount <= channelCountPerNode+1 {
if chCount == 0 {
continue
}
toReleaseCount := chCount - channelCountPerNode
if remainder > 0 && chCount >= maxChannelCountPerNode {
remainder -= 1
toReleaseCount = chCount - maxChannelCountPerNode
}
if toReleaseCount == 0 {
log.Info("node channel count is not much larger than average, skip reallocate",
zap.Int64("nodeID", nChannels.NodeID),
zap.Int("channelCount", chCount),
zap.Int("channelCountPerNode", channelCountPerNode))
continue
}
reallocate := NewNodeChannelInfo(nChannels.NodeID)
toReleaseCount := chCount - channelCountPerNode - 1
for _, ch := range nChannels.Channels {
reallocate.AddChannel(ch)
toReleaseCount--
@ -377,6 +392,7 @@ func AvgAssignByCountPolicy(currentCluster Assignments, toAssign *NodeChannelInf
fromCluster = append(fromCluster, info)
channelNum += len(info.Channels)
nodeToAvg.Insert(info.NodeID)
return
}
// Get toCluster by filtering out execlusive nodes
@ -385,6 +401,7 @@ func AvgAssignByCountPolicy(currentCluster Assignments, toAssign *NodeChannelInf
}
toCluster = append(toCluster, info)
channelNum += len(info.Channels)
nodeToAvg.Insert(info.NodeID)
})

View File

@ -339,16 +339,16 @@ func (s *PolicySuite) TestAvgBalanceChannelPolicy() {
s.Nil(opSet)
})
s.Run("test uneven with conservative effect", func() {
// as we deem that the node having only one channel more than average as even, so there's no reallocation
// for this test case
// even distribution should have not results
uneven := []*NodeChannelInfo{
{100, getChannels(map[string]int64{"ch1": 1, "ch2": 1})},
{NodeID: 101},
}
opSet := AvgBalanceChannelPolicy(uneven)
s.Nil(opSet)
s.Equal(opSet.Len(), 1)
for _, op := range opSet.Collect() {
s.True(lo.Contains([]string{"ch1", "ch2"}, op.GetChannelNames()[0]))
}
})
s.Run("test uneven with zero", func() {
uneven := []*NodeChannelInfo{
@ -639,4 +639,31 @@ func (s *AssignByCountPolicySuite) TestWithUnassignedChannels() {
})
s.ElementsMatch([]int64{3, 1}, nodeIDs)
})
s.Run("assign to reach average", func() {
curCluster := []*NodeChannelInfo{
{1, getChannels(map[string]int64{"ch-1": 1, "ch-2": 1, "ch-3": 1})},
{2, getChannels(map[string]int64{"ch-4": 1, "ch-5": 1, "ch-6": 4, "ch-7": 4, "ch-8": 4})},
}
unassigned := NewNodeChannelInfo(bufferID,
getChannel("new-ch-1", 1),
getChannel("new-ch-2", 1),
getChannel("new-ch-3", 1),
)
opSet := AvgAssignByCountPolicy(curCluster, unassigned, nil)
s.NotNil(opSet)
s.Equal(3, opSet.GetChannelNumber())
s.Equal(2, opSet.Len())
for _, op := range opSet.Collect() {
if op.Type == Delete {
s.Equal(int64(bufferID), op.NodeID)
}
if op.Type == Watch {
s.Equal(int64(1), op.NodeID)
}
}
})
}